Question: So all three judges, Jim Lampley, Emanuel Steward, Harold Lederman are all on the take?
Is that what you're telling me? That none of these men have any personal integrity or honor and they are just there to ensure Manny Pacquiao wins?
Am I really suppose to believe this?
The fight was close, but it wasn't a robbery.
I agree with you 100% Manny won but he struggled but still winning is winning
All they do is call the fight. They have nothing to do with anything else. They are wrong sometimes , but I think it was a draw . it should have been called a draw.
Seabiscuit I don't think that commentators are "on the take" like you say in
this question remember that several times throughout this fight Jim Lampley
did say the scores were "very close" and the scores could be closer in favor
of Juan Manuel Marquez Harold Lederman's scorecard is just a prediction on
how he thinks the fight being scored in his opinion after watching that fight in
person, live at that particular arena. That fight itself was very close and in the
eyes of many boxing fans Juan Manuel Marquez deserved to win that fight he
landed the harder power punches and Juanma was the aggressor through out
the entire boxing contest, he kept moving forward applying pressure if tonights
Top Rank's Pacquiao-Marquez was like this cant wait to see Cotto-Margarito II.
Exactly, it was a close fight, but you have to score based on points. Pacquiao was the obvious winner.
it was a very close fight, marquez did enough to win, but it was not a travesty like chavez-whitaker or a robbery like whitaker-de la hoya.
a draw was well deserved cuz both fighters didnt deserve to win